This item has been officially peer reviewed. Print this Encyclopedia Page Print This Section in a New Window This item is currently being edited or your authorship application is still pending. View published version of content View references for this item

Soil Quality

Authored By: D. Page-Dumroese, M. Jurgensen, D. Neary, M. Curran, C. Trettin

Soil quality and function are interrelated concepts that represent the range of soil properties and their associated ecological processes. The National Forest Management Act of 1976 and related legislation direct U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service managers to maintain the productivity potential of national forest land. The British Columbia Ministry of Forests uses professional assessment to evaluate the impacts of management practices on organic matter (OM) losses (British Columbia Ministry of Forests Forest Practices Code 1997). Even with these mandates and laws, the concept of soil productivity has not been well defined, and the impact of timber removal or fire on the productive potential of soils is not well understood or easily measured (Powers and others 2005). Soil quality has been defined as the capacity of a soil to function within an ecosystem to sustain biological productivity, maintain environmental quality, and promote plant and animal health (Doran and others 1996). In addition, soil health definitions include maintaining the integrity of nutrient cycling and resilience to disturbance or stress (O’Neill and others 2005). Tree or stand growth has often been used as an indicator of soil productivity changes, but growth reductions attributable to management practices may take >20 years to become manifest in many North American ecosystems (Morris and Miller 1994). The forest floor is likely a key element in maintaining healthy ecosystems, but it is also the one most impacted by fire and forest management (Tiedemann and others 2000). Maintaining site organic matter at or near the ecosystem baseline levels may help reduce nutrient losses (McNabb and Cromack 1990), insect (Fellin 1980b) and disease (McDonald and others 2000) outbreaks, and may ultimately reduce many forest health problems. For example, Page-Dumroese and Jurgensen (2006) describe baseline organic matter levels in 13 undisturbed forests around the Northwestern United States. The levels include measurements of downed wood, forest floor and mineral soil organic matter (OM), carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), and they can be used to determine when a site has excess or deficient organic matter stores. Carbon accumulation, as measured by forest floor depth or amounts of downed wood, can be a useful indicator of forest health because forests with OM levels above their historic baseline levels are at risk from increased insect and disease activities or high-intensity fires (Oliver and others 1994).


Click to hide citations... Literature Cited
  • British Columbia Ministry of Forest Practices Code. 1997. Soil conservation surveys guidebook. Victoria B.C.: BC Ministry of Forests, BC Environment.
  • Doran, J.W.; Sarrantonio, M.; Liebig, M.A. 1996. Soil health and sustainability. Advances in Agronomy. 56: 2-54.
  • Fellin, D.G. 1980. Populations of some forest litter, humus, and soil arthropods as affected by silvicultural practices, residue utilization, and prescribed fire. Symposium Proceedings, Environmental consequences of timber harvesting in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Odgen, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 317-334.
  • McDonald, G.I.; Harvey, A.E.; Tonn, J.R. 2000. Fire, competition, and forest pests: landscape treatment to sustain ecosystem function. In: Ryan, K.C.t.e. Proceedings from the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop: crossing the millennium: integrating spatial technologies and ecological principles for a new age in fire management. Boise, ID, June 15-17, 1999. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho: 195-211.
  • McNabb, D.H.; Cromack, K., Jr. 1990. Effects of prescribed fire on nutrients and soil productivity. In: Sandberg, D.V. Natural and prescribed fire in Pacific Northwest forests. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 125-142.
  • Morris, L.A.; Miller, R.E. 1994. Evidence for long-term productivity changes as provided by field trials. In: Comerford, N.B. Impacts of forest harvesting on long-term site productivity. London: Chapman and Hall: 41-80.
  • Oliver, C.D.; Ferguson, D.E.; Harvey, A.E.; [and others]. 1994. Managing ecosystems for forest health: An approach and the effects on uses and values. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2: 113-133.
  • O’Neill, K.P.; Amacher, M.C.; Perry, C.H. 2005. Soils and an indicator of forest health: A guide to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of soil indicator data in the forest inventory and analysis program. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 51 p.
  • Page-Dumroese, D.S.; Jurgensen, M.F. 2006. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools in mid- to late-successional forest stands of the northwestern USA: Potential impact of fire. 36: 2270-2284.
  • Powers, R.F.; Scott, D.A.; Sanchez, F.G.; Voldseth, R.A.; Page-Dumroese, D.; Elioff, J.D.; and Stone, D.M. 2005. The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: Findings from the first decade of research. Forest Ecology and Management. 220: 31-50.
  • Tiedemann, A.R.; Klemmendson, J.O.; Bull, E.L. 2000. Solution of forest health problems with prescribed fire: Are forest productivity and wildlife at risk? North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 127: 1-18.

Encyclopedia ID: p3012



Home » Soil Quality and Healthy Forests » Soil Quality and Function



 
Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Text Size: Large | Normal | Small